Land Use Planning and Approvals Amendment (Development Assessment Panels) Bill 2024
Each of the contributions from non-major party members in here have provided important context and a different aspect and way of looking at this legislation.
Each of the contributions from non-major party members in here have provided important context and a different aspect and way of looking at this legislation.
The Liberals, via a complete about-face on the policy intent of their election campaign announcement, have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory and condemned the university...
This is absolutely about the precedent that is set by this legislation, because when the Tasmanian people voted back in March, they did so for transparency, proper process ...
I am happy to be here today and able to speak to this. When I speak to it, I think of the people that I represent from Bass.
That contribution from the Leader of the House was laughable. Standing Order 226 provides for this situation - for a bill with amendments from the other place like this to be laid
The Greens obviously brought this on because it is a controversial, shonky matter, and we have new information.
Chair, pursuant to Standing Order 226, I move - That the bill be laid aside.
I really respected the thoroughness of your contribution, honourable member. I totally understand why you would vote for this bill, even knowing that it is highly problematic.
Almost every voter walks to the ballot box with a set of interests guiding their decision to vote.
There is clearly an argument, in certain circumstances, for a permit to be extended. I do not think there is any disagreement about that, which is one of the effects ...