Attorney-General, can you outline for us the total figure for legal expenses that has been incurred on behalf of ministers or government backbenchers in 2023‑24 and 2024‑25?
Minister, the Cox Review is nine years old and only six of the 55 recommendations have been implemented. You've said that you're bringing legislation to parliament this year to
A quick overarching question, Treasurer. In the past 18 months, have you, as an individual, been subject to or party to any Supreme Court matters?
Minister, in the past 18 months, have you, as an individual, been a subject of, or party to, any Supreme Court matter?
Now, minister, I need to ask you this question, because we've been asking a number of ministers this question: in broad terms, in the past 18 months, either as a minister or an MP,
An overarching quick question: minister, in the past 18 months have you as an individual been subject, or party to, any Supreme Court matters?
Premier, in the past 18 months have you, as an individual, been a subject of, or a party to, any Supreme Court matters?
With no timeline, no concrete plans, and no extra funding for reform, why would anyone believe Jeremy Rockliff is serious about strengthening the Integrity Commission?
The Rockliff Government must come clean about the $250,000 in taxpayer money spent on legal fees on behalf of unknown MPs for unknown reasons.
It is plain to see, through the debate across the course of the day today, that we have lost trust in government and we believe we share that with the Tasmanian public.