Polling Confirms Tasmanians Want Stadium Cost Transparency
The Rockliff Government can’t keep ignoring both the community and the Parliament on the true costs of its unpopular, unaffordable Macquarie Point stadium.
The Rockliff Government can’t keep ignoring both the community and the Parliament on the true costs of its unpopular, unaffordable Macquarie Point stadium.
There are serious inconsistencies between what RTI documents have revealed and what the CG told the PAC about the development of his “independent” opinion piece on the stadium.
RTI documents have exposed the level of input from the Devils, MBA and the Premier’s office on the Coordinator-General’s analysis of the economic impacts of the stadium.
Honourable Speaker, this morning I asked the Premier some serious questions about the conduct of the Coordinator‑General
In early July, work began to excavate and remove contaminated soil from the stadium site at Macquarie Point
I think what I got from that debate that there is almost furious agreement that $1.13 billion is not where the cost of this project is going to stop.
Yes, the Greens didn't support the building of the stadium. Yes, we stood with the majority of Tasmanians who chose, and who would like the money not to be spent on a third stadium
I rise to talk to this motion, at its heart, it's a transparency motion in relation to the cost estimate of the Macquarie Point stadium.
The Liberals and Labor have teamed up to vote down a Greens’ motion ordering public transparency on the stadium costs.
The Greens are on record with serious concerns about Webuild's involvement in a joint venture approved to tender to construct the Mac Point stadium.