Now that your Treasurer has contradicted your ridiculous efforts to spin Tasmanians, will you finally admit that the $375 million cost cap is dead? You've broken your promise and
Given your long‑stated attitude to intergenerational debt, you've just justified this by saying you're going to 'grow the pie', yet your own Treasury, in the Pre-Election Financial
What's the plan? It's clear to us that you and the MPDC can't be trusted to tell the truth about the contaminated soils on site. As minister responsible for the stadium, how do you
We asked MPDC how much contaminated soil containing asbestos, lead, mercury, arsenic, cyanide and other chemicals of concern was under the footprint of your stadium and we were ...
After two credit rating downgrades and devastating evidence from the TPC, government desperation ahead of next week’s stadium vote is showing.
The downgrading of Tasmania’s credit rating is an indictment on the Liberal Government, and yet more proof of why the proposed Macquarie Point stadium must be rejected.
In the wake of Budget Estimates, Greens MPs have called on the Treasurer to be transparent about the annual interest payments on government borrowings.
Did the Heritage Council get answers to all of its questions through that process, and did it change its view at the end of the day?
Before I launch into my question, I echo the sentiment. It was a question I was going to ask as well. I've heard that and I guess just urge the government about thinking about it
Yesterday, the Macquarie Point Development Corporation informed us there was an estimated 130,000 cubic metres of contaminated fill beneath the footprint of the proposed stadium at